Mr. Pina we do not have translation scheduled today. Would you contact me after the meeting and I can work to make sure you are provided a translation of the meeting minutes and future translation

Need some support here. I'm I in the zoom room

Larry you are unmuted we can hear you

I am trying to regulate Rents in Napa County of its excesses in cost and low salary and I think you are the right ones, since I have contacted the supervisor Alfredo Pedro and Councilman Bernardo Narváez and they have not given any solution. This is affecting housing in various ways, in lowering students because they emigrate to cheaper places. I hope one of you can give me an interview. Thank you

Kellie, Can you confirm you have your hand raised?

I consider myself not present at this meeting . I can not see video.

How's that?

good

👏

Mr. Pina - Thank you for the comment. We hope you are able to continue with this presentation and I would ask if you and I could talk afterwards. Please contact me at trevor.hawkes@countyofnapa.org or by phone 707-253-4388

Has the low income amount changed?

Angelica Chavez - Can you ask the question more specifically? I'm not 100% sure what you are asking.

Has the state taking in consideration that cost of living has increased therefore has the low income amount changed

Thank you. I'll address your question at the conclusion of committee comments

I HAVE QUESTIONS ON GOAL h-2G, GOAL h-7, GOAL h-4. I

farmworkers and hospitality are leaving Napa as a place of employment due to housing. leading to more vineyard mechanization, and employer provided housing under H2A and other provisos. Restaurants and hotels are more challenged and not able to staff at pre covid levels.

Thank you for the comment Committee Member Gamble

A local preference ordinance can help the workforce get into both rental housing and ownership. This will also reduce the number of units that end up as second homes.

Thank you for the comment Committee Member Gallagher

DAVID WE KNOW THIS.

www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-elements.docs/6th-web-he-duedate.pdf

that is website I have found this information….

For Joelle and others interested in a local employee preference ordinance - would this apply to all housing units constructed or just to assisted housing units (e.g., subsidized affordable units)?

A few speakers have raised the question of "how to better track our progress" - are there e.g.s of goals from other jurisdictions that include this tracking focus as an actual goal of the element?

Kelllie Do you mean insurance on ADU? ADU's can be insured by homeowner who built/owns the ADU.

To Kellie Anderson's point and believe that we need to advocate for inclusive policed

*inclusive polices to be implemented into planning and zoning

Joelle: insurance availability is becoming a greater issue. as policies come up for renewal they are being non renewed. Insurers are pulling out of Napa County at an increasing rate regardless of Fire Severity area ranking. this will hamper all housing construction needing insurance.

Trevor Matt please follow up with Fair Plan refual to provide insurance coverage to ADU in Napa County.

Fair Plan limits, regardless of ADUs, is inadequate on a long term basis.

what do you consider a fire resconstruction policy?

id like to comment on programs

Please raise your hand for comments at the end of this item.

Tom: Right. Has many implications for land use.

my hand is raised

Matt, The ordinances I have seen refer to the rent or purchase of "affordable and workforce housing units which are supported or sponsored by the City/County of XXX" One also has an exception for "Former Resident Set Aside"

Thank you Joelle for the clarification.

I want to be sure that when we consider affordable housing to include below market rate housing for sale as apart of that program

Keri, this opportunity will be available in the Heritage Housing project on Old Sonoma Road (old HHS site). :)

i agree with heather.

I would like if you share with me the link of the recording of this zoom. esbe_pial@hotmail.com

lets see annaction item!

I believe the RHNA information was presented and discussed at Meeting #1 of this committee.

Correction: Meeting 2 in November.

what were the 12 different organizations for stakeholder input?

Esbeidy Pina - Will do

Hillary thank you for that clarification. That makes our seeing how successful the city has been with the past agreement.

Committee Member Anderson - I will try to provide the list as we finish or in a follow up email (my HE folder is behind the screen share)

Stakeholders selected for outreach

• Abode• Buckelew• California Human Development Corp• Commission on Aging, Coc, HAPi• Crosswalk Community Church• Fair Housing• Napa Housing Coalition• Napa Valley Community Housing• Napa-Sonoma ADU• Northbay Realtors• Puertas Abiertas• Up Valley Family Center

i have question

Thanks Hillery - besides "why this site could develop" I'm always interested in "why this one hasn't developed yet" - past constraints?

yes this item

I am sorry but I have to sign off.

Id like the next meeting to be in person. What are the committe thoughts?

Happy to be in person.